Flores v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENAVIDES, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the unlawful delivery of marihuana, in an amount of more than 200 pounds, but less than 2,000 pounds. The court found appellant guilty and assessed punishment at ten years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.
Appellant asserts one point of error by which he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for an entry of acquittal.
The standard for review of the sufficiency of the evidence, whether circumstantial or direct, is whether any rational trier of fact could…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Conaway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pena v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Valladares v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Valladares v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Valladares v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990