Legal Opinion

Valladares v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1990No. 6-89-101-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Roy Valladares appeals pro se from his conviction for delivery by actual transfer of more than fifty pounds and less than two hundred pounds of marihuana. The jury assessed punishment at ten years in the penitentiary and a fine of $500.00. Valla-dares complains in his sole point of error that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict because an actual delivery of the marihuana was not shown. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Queen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Conaway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Nevarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Caraballo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. State v. HeltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Valladares v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API