Legal Opinion
In Re Suspension of the Capital Unitary Review Act
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 19, 1999No. 110 W.D. Misc. Dkt. 1997PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 1999, the Petition for Reconsideration is DENIED.
OPINION IN SUPPORT OF ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION
CASTILLE, Justice.
Petitioner, the Attorney General, has filed a Petition for Reconsideration of this Court’s decision to suspend the Capital Unitary Review Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9570-9579 (hereinafter “CURA”), on August 11, 1997. Having carefully considered the briefs filed by all parties who have asserted an interest in this matter, this Court remains determined that the initial decision to suspend CURA was correct for the reasons set forth herein.
At the…
3Cases cited35 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ZettlemoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. MoralesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Maxwell Hoffman v. A.J. Arave, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Payne v. Commonwealth Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.