Legal Opinion

Troutman v. Erlandson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 25, 1984No. 77-8-122; CA A29253PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Defendants appeal from an order confirming a sheriffs sale of real property. ORS 23.490. We affirm. In 1978, plaintiff obtained a decree against defendants on a creditor’s bill. Defendant Ralf Erlandson had made transfers to his wife, defendant Patricia Erlandson, to avoid paying two judgments of plaintiffs. In January, 1980, we affirmed the decree but required that it be modified:

“[D]efendants contend that Patricia Erlandson had an interest in Mira Monte farms which was separate and distinct from those interests transferred to her by her husband. They presented some evidence to that effect.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bush v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Abrams v. RushlightOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Troutman v. ErlandsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Thompson v. THOMPSONOregon Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Citibank Federal Savings Bank v. New Plan Realty TrustCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API