Legal Opinion

Jordan v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1895No. 17,709PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

By indictment the appellant was charged with having “unlawfully, feloniously, willfully and maliciously set fire to and burned a certain flouring, grist and corn mill-house of Samuel A. Jordan, Aaron G. Jordan and Winfield S. Lane,” etc. A motion to quash the indictment was overruled and, upon a trial by jury, the appellant was found guilty as charged. The only assigned errors of the trial court are in overruling the motion to quash the indictment and in overruling a motion for a new trial. It is contended that the indictment was insufficient in failing to charge the burning of a building and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bassett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Ford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Doolittle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Hutchason v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Wolf v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wedmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Fowler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Beyerline v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State v. HindmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API