Legal Opinion
Martin v. City of Eastlake
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 18, 1988No. C86-3969PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OP OPINION
KRENZLER, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Timothy Martin (“Martin”), commenced the instant action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“§ 1983”) against defendants, City of Eastlake (“City”), William DePledge, Chief of Police for the City (“DePledge”), Thomas Doyle, police officer for the City (“Doyle”), and Robert Jaksa, police officer for the City (“Jaksa”). Martin alleges deprivation of his constitutional rights under color of state law. The amended complaint, in essence, alleges that defendants Doyle and Jaksa, acting as police officers under color of state law, violated…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cook v. NelsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Bettio v. Village of NorthfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
- Pesek v. City of BrunswickDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
- Scarso v. Cuyahoga County Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1989
- Pierson Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Pierson TownshipDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.