Legal Opinion
Meros v. CITY OF EUCLID, OHIO
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 15, 1984No. C83-4353PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
KRENZLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff commenced this action on October 26, 1984, alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for infringement of his First Amendment rights. Plaintiff seeks in part a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 that City of Euclid Ordinance 75-1982 unconstitutionally deprives him of freedom of speech, as well as an order enjoining defendant from enforcing said ordinance. Ordinance 75-1982 prohibits the display of political lawn signs within the city but allows political window graphics within an occupied residence. Defendants filed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of WillingboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Euclid, Appeal OfCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- City of Euclid v. MabelOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Gilleo v. City of LadueDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1991
- Tauber v. Town of LongmeadowDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- Thomas L. Meros v. Anthony J. Giunta, City of EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985