Bloome v. Haverly
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Dwyer, A.C.J.
¶1 A court may issue a declaratory judgment only where a justiciable controversy exists between adverse parties. Because the record herein does not establish the existence of a mature dispute that may be conclusively resolved by either of the forms of declaratory relief sought by the parties, a justiciable controversy does not exist between them. The grant of declaratory relief as requested by either party would constitute a prohibited advisory opinion. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further necessary proceedings.
I
¶2 Jackson Haverly owns a house and surrounding property…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Newport Yacht Basin Ass'n of Condominium Owners v. Supreme Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Pasado's Safe Haven v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Pasado's Safe Haven v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- American Traffic Solutions, Inc. v. City of BellinghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Riverview Community Group v. Spencer & LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.