Legal Opinion

Bloome v. Haverly

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 11, 2010No. 62974-3-IPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dwyer, A.C.J.

¶1 A court may issue a declaratory judgment only where a justiciable controversy exists between adverse parties. Because the record herein does not establish the existence of a mature dispute that may be conclusively resolved by either of the forms of declaratory relief sought by the parties, a justiciable controversy does not exist between them. The grant of declaratory relief as requested by either party would constitute a prohibited advisory opinion. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further necessary proceedings.

I

¶2 Jackson Haverly owns a house and surrounding property…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Newport Yacht Basin Ass'n of Condominium Owners v. Supreme Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Pasado's Safe Haven v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. Pasado's Safe Haven v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. American Traffic Solutions, Inc. v. City of BellinghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Riverview Community Group v. Spencer & LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API