Legal Opinion

Foster v. Mabus

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 12, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2011-1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge

Pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment from the defendants, the Secretary of the Navy and the Commanding General of the U.S. Marine Corps’ Training and Education Command (“TECOM”), and from the plaintiff, retired Marine Corps Master Sergeant Carl Foster. Defs.’ Mot. Dismiss or, alternative, Mot. Summ J. (“Defs.’ Mot.”) at 1, ECF No. 34; Pl.’s Mot. Summ. J. on Admin. R. (“Pl.’s Mot.”) at 1, ECF No. 35. This is the second round of summary judgment motions filed by these parties concerning the Marine Corps’…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Havens v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Bias v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Crooks v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Cooper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Greene v. CarsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API