Maddux v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MIRABAL, Justice.
A jury found appellant, Clayton Allen Maddux, guilty of murder. The jury assessed punishment at 30-years confinement. We affirm.
In his sixth point of error, appellant asserts the trial court abused its discretion in preventing him from asking a proper question on voir dire. Specifically, he complains the trial court prevented him from questioning the venire members on whether the fact a young child had been killed would influence their consideration of probation. The victim in the present case was a two- and-a-half year-old girl.
The standard of review in a case where…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Nunfio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
- Maddux v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- State v. PurdyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Maddux v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Maddux v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.