Legal Opinion

Maddux v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided February 20, 1992No. 01-89-00621-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MIRABAL, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Clayton Allen Maddux, guilty of murder. The jury assessed punishment at 30-years confinement. We affirm.

In his sixth point of error, appellant asserts the trial court abused its discretion in preventing him from asking a proper question on voir dire. Specifically, he complains the trial court prevented him from questioning the venire members on whether the fact a young child had been killed would influence their consideration of probation. The victim in the present case was a two- and-a-half year-old girl.

The standard of review in a case where…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Nunfio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  2. Maddux v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. State v. PurdyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Maddux v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Maddux v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API