Maddux v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MALONEY, Judge.
A jury convicted appellant of murder and assessed punishment at thirty (30) years imprisonment. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 19.02. In a partially published opinion, the First Court of Appeals affirmed with one justice dissenting. Maddux v. State, 825 S.W.2d 511 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether our holding in Nunfio v. State, 808 S.W.2d 482 (Tex.Crim.App.1991) is applicable to nontestifying witnesses such as deceased victims.1 We hold that it is.
Duri…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Nunfio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Standefer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Etheridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Chimney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
- Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.