Legal Opinion
Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 22, 1998No. Nos. 2663, 2666 and 2761 C.D. 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEADBETTER, Judge.
These are consolidated appeals taken from a final order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. The order dismissed a complaint filed by the Township of Findlay without a formal hearing. By the complaint, the Township sought a means to obtain lower cost electric service in the Township. We remand.
In 1993, the Township of Findlay (Township) filed a formal complaint on its behalf and on behalf of its residents against Du-quesne Light Company (Duquesne) and West Penn Power Company (West Penn) with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission). Duquesne provides…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Bell Tel. Co. of Pa. v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public UtilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Monroeville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Aizen v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sandel v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- FirstEnergy PA Electric Co., Aplt. v. PUCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
- FirstEnergy v. PUC; Cross Apl of: Verizon PASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026