Legal Opinion
United States v. The Prescon Corporation and Vsl Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1983No. 82-1807, 82-1812, 82-2196, 82-2197PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals from the judgments of sentences entered against appellees, The Prescon Corporation (Prescon) and VSL Corporation (VSL), or, in the alternative, petitions for a writ of mandamus to obtain an order directing the sentencing court to vacate the judgments of sentences. Our jurisdiction vests pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731 and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Prescon and VSL pleaded nolo contendere to an indictment charging them, and others, with rigging bids on commercial construction projects in Colorado and some nine neighboring states. Both corporations perform…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. StoehrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. John Horak, and United States of America v. John HorakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Bernard P. Elkin, A/K/A "Bob Elkin," and Boston Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States of America v. James Truesdale Ronald HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Thomas William Mayo, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. James R. Gallup, United States of America v. Darryl E. DukeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.