Legal Opinion

In re DLC Corp.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 1, 1998No. 97-321PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

DLC Corporation d/b/a Pour Man’s Pub appeals an order of the Vermont Liquor Control Board, which issued a first and third-class liquor license to DLC subject to several conditions. DLC contends that the Board exceeded both its constitutional and statutory authority by placing those conditions upon DLC’s liquor license. We affirm.

Laurel Chapman is the sole director and stockholder of DLC, which leased a building in Rutland to be used as a bar — Pour Man’s Pub. The building had housed another bar — June’s Corner Bar — previously, and Glenn David Chapman, Ms. Chapman’s husband, managed June’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. In re Club 107Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. Billado v. Control CommissionersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
  4. Green Mountain Post No. 1 v. Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
  5. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Rusty Nail Acquisition, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  2. Routhier v. GogginsDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2017
  3. In re Rusty Nail Asquisition, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  4. Lonie Parker DBA Porky's Bkyd BBQ SP & NOV - Decision on MotionVermont Superior Court · 2020
  5. zenoethridge v. comcastVermont Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API