Fraser v. State Ex Rel. Biggs

This is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, under subdivision 1 of section 9932 of the Code, to exclude the respondent from unlawfully practicing the profession of a chiropractor in the treatment of human beings for disease.

It has been fully settled that it is a civil proceeding, and is not governed by the principles and rules of practice applicable to criminal cases. Belding v. State, 214 Ala. 380, 107 So. 853; Harris v. State (Ala. Sup.) 109 So. 291. Hence the respondent’s demand that she he allowed two strikes-for every one allowed to the state in the selection of a jury, as in…