Legal Opinion

Action for Childrens Television v. Federal Communication Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 18, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-0400 RCLPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This case comes before the cdurt on plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, and plaintiffs’ and defendant’s cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated in this Memorandum Opinion, the court denies plaintiffs’ motions for a preliminary injunction and summary judgment and grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND. 1

Plaintiffs are a group of broadcasters and interested listeners/viewers who challenge the procedure under which the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) regulates indecent broadcasting.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Action for Children's Television v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  2. Rocky Mountain Radar, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Washington Legal Foundation v. KesslerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  4. City of Ellensburg v. King Videocable Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. Action For Children's Television v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API