Legal Opinion

Utley v. City of St. Petersburg

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 8, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, C.J.

In this case it appears that the City of St. Petersburg decided to widen a certain street. It became necessary to condemn a certain piece of land to use as a part of the street. It appears that that part of the street which had previously existed was paved and when the City had condemned this strip of land it proceeded to pave a strip 27 5/10 feet wide on the south side of the paving then existing for a distance extending across the front of appellants’ property and assessed the entire cost of such paving against the appellants’ property, making an assessment therefor in the •sum of $882.35,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Gast Realty & Investment Co. v. Schneider Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Webb v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Carter v. City of North MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  4. Webb v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API