Legal Opinion
Frame v. City of Arlington
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 7, 2009No. 08-10630PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiffs are persons with disabilities who depend on motorized wheelchairs for mobility. They allege that the City of Arlington, by failing to make the City’s curbs, sidewalks, and certain parking lots ADA-compliant, has violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act. The district court dismissed their complaint on the basis that their claims were barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations. This appeal raises more than one issue of first impression — at least for this court. Initially, we must decide whether…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Frame v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Doe v. Baylor UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2017
- Pena v. Bexar County, TexasDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2010
- Westerngeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Betancourt v. Federated Department StoresDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.