Legal Opinion

Garber v. Nationwide Insurance Co., No. Cv98-0488913s (Mar. 25, 1999)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 25, 1999No. CV98-0488913SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

The defendant, Nationwide General Insurance Company, filed a Motion to Strike the second count of the plaintiffs complaint on the grounds that: no private right of action exists under the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act (hereinafter "CUIPA"). Plaintiff filed a memorandum in opposition to the defendants motion, arguing that this court may recognize a private right under CUIPA.

For reasons more fully set forth below, this court holds that there is no private right of action under CUIPA;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Lees v. Middlesex InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Griswold v. Union Labor Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Gulack v. GulackConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API