Legal Opinion

Kopplin v. Ewald

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 18, 1934No. 9319PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

The estate of Herman Ewald, deceased, is being duly administered by Erna Ewald Kopplin, independent executrix thereunto duly appointed and qualified under the will of the said Herman Ewald. It was provided in said will, which was probated in the county court of Bexar county, that no other action should be had upon said estate in said court but the probate of the will and the return of an inventory and appraisement of the estate, as provided in article 3436, R. S. 1925.

On April 4,1933, Mary Ewald, widow of the deceased Herman, instituted this original proceeding in a district…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roy v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Holmes v. JohnsTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Lumpkin v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rowland v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Hutcherson v. HutchersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Basham v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Cooper v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Walling v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API