Legal Opinion

Basham v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1950No. A-2650PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garwood

The Court of Civil Appeals reversed and remanded this cause in which the petitioners, Basham et al., as plaintiffs, had judgment on a verdict in the district court for statutory triple damages and attorney fees under U. S. C. A., Title 50 Appendix secs. 925(e) and 1895 by reason of alleged rental overcharges collected by their landlady, a Mrs. Aldredge, testatrix of the defendant-respondents, Bayard Martin Smith and wife, who were respectively independent executor and trustee under the will. 227 S. W. 2d 853. The suit was begun against the testatrix, but on her death before trial the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dearborn Stove Co. v. CaplesTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp. v. T.F. Stone-Liberty Land Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  3. Texas Livestock Marketing Ass'n v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Podgoursky v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Lavender v. Hofer, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API