Legal Opinion

Sexson v. Servaas

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided July 21, 1993No. IP 91-451-CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY FROM CHAMBERS

BARKER, District Judge.

Any litigant in a court of the United States may legitimately expect that the presiding judge will be impartial and will listen to and evaluate the merits of any arguments presented without prejudice or bias. So important is this expectation to American notions of justice that judges must not only be impartial adjudicators, they must also avoid activities which create the appearance of bias and thereby undermine the integrity of the courts. Plaintiffs, through their counsel, Stephen Laudig (“Laudig”) and Kevin McShane (“McShane”) (collectively…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. In Re Diana R. Beard, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. John M. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Mitsui Shintaku Ginko K. K., Tokyo v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA, INC. v. CafesjianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. In Re CookeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
  3. Peterson v. BorstIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Travelers Insurance v. St. Jude Medical Office Building, Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1994
  5. Marozsan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API