Shore v. Norfolk National Bank of Commerce
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtScheNOK, J.
Section 569 of the Consolidated Statutes provides: “Upon trial of an issue of fact by the court, its decision shall be given in writing, and shall contain a statement of the facts found, and the conclusions of law separately.”
The decision of the court as it relates to “the facts found” contains only the following: “The court finds the facts to be as testified to by P. C. Shore, the only witness at the trial, both as to his direct and cross-examination, and as shown by the written and record evidence introduced, and the admissions in the pleadings.” We do not think this is a compliance with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Raleigh Banking & Trust Co. v. Safety Transit Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Knott v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
3Cited by9 opinions
- Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- In re L.L.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Haywood Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Arnold v. Ray Charles Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Jamison v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.