Legal Opinion

Shore v. Norfolk National Bank of Commerce

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheNOK, J.

Section 569 of the Consolidated Statutes provides: “Upon trial of an issue of fact by the court, its decision shall be given in writing, and shall contain a statement of the facts found, and the conclusions of law separately.”

The decision of the court as it relates to “the facts found” contains only the following: “The court finds the facts to be as testified to by P. C. Shore, the only witness at the trial, both as to his direct and cross-examination, and as shown by the written and record evidence introduced, and the admissions in the pleadings.” We do not think this is a compliance with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Raleigh Banking & Trust Co. v. Safety Transit Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Knott v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. In re L.L.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Haywood Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Arnold v. Ray Charles Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Jamison v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API