Legal Opinion

Rector v. Southern Coal Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 31, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

The question of law presented by this case is, what duty does the owner' of a mule owe to an employee who has charge of the mule and who goes into the stall where the mule is ?

A mule is a melancholy creature. It is a nullius filius in the animal kingdom. It has been said that a mule has neither “pride of ancestry nor hope of posterity.” Josh Billings remarked that if he had to preach the funeral of a mule he would stand at his head. Men love and pet horses, dogs, cats and lambs. These domestic animals have found their way in literature. Shakespeare said of a horse: “I will not change my horse…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. . BowenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Cockerham v. . NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1850
  3. Dix v. Somerset Coal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Harris v. . FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Tolin v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. MoseleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Plumidies v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Griner v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Banks v. . MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Town of Atlantic Beach v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API