Legal Opinion

Lerman v. Heeman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 17, 1997No. 3, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

The questions presented are whether a joint tortfeasor, who has filed a Motion for Judgment of Contribution or Recovery Over pursuant to Maryland Rule 2-614, must have filed a cross-claim in the underlying tort suit, and whether that Motion for Contribution, when arising out of a medical malpractice action, is subject to mandatory arbitration under the Health Care Malpractice Claims Act. We shall hold that a joint-tortfeasor need not file a cross-claim prior to filing a Motion for Contribution, and that a Motion for Contribution, the decision of which does not require any further…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Beales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. In re Victor B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. County Council v. OffenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Drug Fair of Maryland, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Pickett v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Somuah v. FlachsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Sears v. GussinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Max's of Camden Yards v. A.C. BeverageCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API