Legal Opinion

Sears v. Gussin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 31, 1998No. 117, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

Appellant Sears Roebuck & Co., seeks documents reflecting investments, gifts, asset transfers, trusts, income, and real property in the possession of Ernst & Young L.L.P., accountants for Appellee Paul Gussin. We shall hold that the client did not waive the accountant-client privilege found in Mary land Code (1974, 1995 Repl.Vol., 1997 Supp.), § 9-110 of the Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article 1 and, accordingly, shall affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County.

I

Appellant Sears, Roebuck & Co., (hereinafter “Sears”) obtained a judgment in the amount of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Remington Arms Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
  5. Frank v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fister v. Allstate Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Addison v. Lochearn Nursing Home, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Cain v. Midland Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Total Audio-Visual Systems, Inc. v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API