Sears v. Gussin
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
Appellant Sears Roebuck & Co., seeks documents reflecting investments, gifts, asset transfers, trusts, income, and real property in the possession of Ernst & Young L.L.P., accountants for Appellee Paul Gussin. We shall hold that the client did not waive the accountant-client privilege found in Mary land Code (1974, 1995 Repl.Vol., 1997 Supp.), § 9-110 of the Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article 1 and, accordingly, shall affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County.
I
Appellant Sears, Roebuck & Co., (hereinafter “Sears”) obtained a judgment in the amount of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Remington Arms Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- Frank v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fister v. Allstate Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Addison v. Lochearn Nursing Home, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Cain v. Midland Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Total Audio-Visual Systems, Inc. v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.