Legal Opinion
Berkner v. Bell Helmets, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided April 22, 1993No. Civ. 1:92-CV-716-JECPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARNES, District Judge.
This case is presently before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment [# 12-1], plaintiffs motion for oral argument [# 18-2], and plaintiffs motion for leave to file response to defendant’s reply brief [# 18-1]. The Court has reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties and, for the reasons set out below, concludes that defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be granted, plaintiffs motion for oral argument should be denied, and plaintiffs motion for leave to file a response to defendant’s reply brief should be denied.
A. Facts
On December…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samples v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Stodghill v. Fiat-Allis Construction MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Lois Elaine Wilson v. Bicycle South, Inc., a Georgia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Berkner v. Bell Helmets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993