Stodghill v. Fiat-Allis Construction MacHinery, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Banke, Judge.
While the appellant was using a bulldozer manufactured by the appellees to clear felled trees from a construction site, a tree jumped over the bulldozer blade and struck him in the chest. In this products liability action, he contends that the machine was defective in that it had no protective metal cage surrounding the driver’s seat and that this alleged defect was the proximate cause of his injuries. This appeal is from the grant of summary judgment to the appellees based on the doctrine of assumption of risk.
The appellant was in the employ of Woodward Construction Company at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Center Chemical Co. v. ParziniSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Shields v. Morton Chemical CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Hunt v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Caterpillar, Inc. v. ShearsTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Weatherby v. Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Coast Catamaran Corp. v. MannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Giordano v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Morrison v. Kubota Tractor Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.