In Re Disciplinary Action Against Nathan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This disciplinary action arises out of the misconduct of the respondent, Dale C. Nathan, in a child custody matter and a CHIPS proceeding. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) filed a petition for disciplinary action on May 2, 2002. A hearing was held on October 2 and 3, 2002, before the Honorable Warren E. Litynski acting as referee. The referee found that Nathan: (1) violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.1, 3.4(c), 4.4, and 8.4(d) by engaging in a pattern of harassing and frivolous litigation; (2) violated Rules 3.4(c) and 8.4(d) by violating,…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Matter of WestfallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against WestbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HougeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Larry S. SEVERSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 99363Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Lynne A. TORGERSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 208322Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against HolkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.