Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Nathan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 26, 2003No. C5-02-519PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This disciplinary action arises out of the misconduct of the respondent, Dale C. Nathan, in a child custody matter and a CHIPS proceeding. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) filed a petition for disciplinary action on May 2, 2002. A hearing was held on October 2 and 3, 2002, before the Honorable Warren E. Litynski acting as referee. The referee found that Nathan: (1) violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.1, 3.4(c), 4.4, and 8.4(d) by engaging in a pattern of harassing and frivolous litigation; (2) violated Rules 3.4(c) and 8.4(d) by violating,…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Matter of WestfallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against WestbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HougeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Larry S. SEVERSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 99363Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Lynne A. TORGERSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 208322Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against HolkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API