Legal Opinion

Savage v. Savage

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] This is an appeal from a decision to extend an alimony award under a divorce decree based on an oral stipulation and agreement of the parties. The trial court determined that a time limited alimony award could be extended based on the trial court’s inherent power to modify an alimony award upon proof of change in circumstances. Jim Savage, the husband and obligor, appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶2.] Jim and Kathryn Savage were divorced on February 26, 1997. The divorce decree incorporated an oral Stipulation and Agreement by the parties. The stipulation included an alimony…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Connolly v. ConnollySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Havens v. HenningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Steffens v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Paradeis v. ParadeisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Dejong v. DejongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Oman v. OmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Vandyke v. Jieun ChoiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Leedom v. LeedomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API