Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Paradeis v. Paradeis

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1990No. 16814PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES

Phyllis Paradeis (Phyllis) filed an Application for Order to Show Cause based upon Donald Paradeis’ (Donald) delinquency in the making of alimony payments.

On May 26, 1989, the Court heard evidence relating to this matter. The Court determined that monies Phyllis had received from Donald after their divorce would be considered alimony and not a loan, relieving Donald of any alimony ar-rearages and that alimony would cease in this matter. On appeal Phyllis argues:(1) That the trial court abused its discretion in holding that Donald’s reduced earning…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Connelly v. SherwoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Connolly v. ConnollySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bradeen v. BradeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Wegner v. WegnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Grode v. GrodeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Christians v. ChristiansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Saxvik v. SaxvikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Olson v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Priebe v. PriebeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API