Zerbe v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
On Petition for Rehearing
CONNOR, Justice.
The State of Alaska petitions for rehearing on the ground that we have overlooked, failed to consider, or misconceived a controlling principle or proposition of law. It asserts that in the opinion which we handed down in this case we did not consider the principle that when a statute is adopted from another jurisdiction it is presumed that interpretations of that statute by courts of that jurisdiction are also adopted with it.
The state asserts that such cases as Duenges v. United States, 114 F.Supp. 751 (S.D.N.Y.1953), Klein v. United States,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Morgan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Whitney v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Lewis v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Doe v. DurtschiIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. RastopsoffCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Carter v. HoblitAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Chinnery v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
- Lenaerts v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.