Legal Opinion

Zerbe v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1978No. 3159PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

On Petition for Rehearing

CONNOR, Justice.

The State of Alaska petitions for rehearing on the ground that we have overlooked, failed to consider, or misconceived a controlling principle or proposition of law. It asserts that in the opinion which we handed down in this case we did not consider the principle that when a statute is adopted from another jurisdiction it is presumed that interpretations of that statute by courts of that jurisdiction are also adopted with it.

The state asserts that such cases as Duenges v. United States, 114 F.Supp. 751 (S.D.N.Y.1953), Klein v. United States,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Morgan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Whitney v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Lewis v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Doe v. DurtschiIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. RastopsoffCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  3. Carter v. HoblitAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Chinnery v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
  5. Lenaerts v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API