Legal Opinion

Rosales v. Rollag

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 25, 2024No. 2:22-cv-01581Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Brandee Rosales, No. CV-22-01581-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Sarah Rollag, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This case arises from a rear-end collision which Plaintiff Brandee Rosales (“Plaintiff 16 Rosales”) alleges caused the premature birth of her daughter, A.T. (“Plaintiff A.T.”), as 17 well as other injuries (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). (Doc. 5-1 at ¶¶ 13–16). Defendant Sarah 18 Rollag (“Defendant”) has filed two motions to exclude Plaintiffs expert witnesses. 19 (Docs. 27 & 28). Defendant argues…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API