Legal Opinion
Plans, Inc. v. Sacramento City Unified School District Twin Ridges Elementary School District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 10, 2003No. 01-16437PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge.
The People for Legal and Non Sectarian Schools (“PLANS”) sued the Sacramento City and Twin Ridges Elementary school districts for sponsoring and supporting Waldorf schools with public funds. PLANS appeals the district court’s judgment and order denying it taxpayer standing. Because PLANS does not challenge a specific program or activity, but rather the Waldorf school curriculum as a whole, and because the schools are supported by a measurable amount of public funds, we find that PLANS enjoys taxpayer standing to proceed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Doremus v. Board of Ed. of HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- John Watkins v. Ameripride Services, Dba Ameripride Uniform ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Qwest Corp. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- We are America/Somos America v. Maricopa County Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
- Turner v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Arakaki v. ApolionaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.