Legal Opinion

Baile Co., Inc. v. Stong Stong

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1924No. Appeal, 191PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

Taking the facts in this case most strongly against the appellees, it appears from the record that on December 1, 1923, less than fifteen days after the service of plaintiff’s statement, the defendant, Charles L. Stong, on behalf of himself and his codefendant signed and swore to an affidavit of defense, which set up a valid defense to the plaintiff’s claim; it alleged that the plaintiff had contracted to do all. the work declared upon in the statement for the sum of twenty dollars, which amount defendants had paid on December 6, 1921, and which plaintiff, in its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fuel City Mfg. Co. v. Waynesburg Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Cinnaminson Park Co. v. LawsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Public Ledger Co. v. KleinmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scott v. McEwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Mann v. Schneller, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API