Legal Opinion

People v. Pointer

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1984No. AO17295PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

Our principal inquiry in this case is whether a woman convicted of the felony of child endangerment (Pen. Code, § 273a, subd. (1)) and found to be in violation of a custody decree (§ 278.5) 1 may, as a condition of probation, be prohibited from conceiving a child. As a preliminary matter, we must also determine whether section 273a, subdivision (1), defines a specific intent crime.

I

Appellant, Ruby Pointer, has at all material times been the devoted adherent of a rigorously disciplined macrobiotic diet. 2 She is also the mother of two children, Jamal and Barron, who at the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. HeitzmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. Llamas-VillaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. People v. ReinertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API