Legal Opinion

People v. Reinertson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 1986No. Crim. 13676PublishedCited by 40 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPARKS, J.

Defendant was convicted of lewd conduct with children and was placed on probation with a condition of home detention. Thereafter his probation was revoked and his suspended state prison sentence was ordered into effect. Defendant tenders two issues in the published portion of this case: whether the home detention order was valid and whether he is entitled to credit for the time he spent in home detention while on probation. We first conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the home detention order was valid. We next hold that defendant is not entitled to credit…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. MobleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. PointerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. State v. SpeaksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. E.O.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. In Re Sheena K.California Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People v. Ramon M.California Court of Appeal · 2009

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API