Legal Opinion

Daughters of Miriam Center for the Aged v. Mathews

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 29, 1978No. 78-1050PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

When Congress establishes a program to aid a particular segment of the population, it often perceives a need and envisions a goal, but as a practical matter cannot sketch the intricate details for implementing its plan. In such cases, the task of administration is frequently delegated to an agency, which is directed to develop necessary rules in light of experience. To ensure the fullest possible attainment of the legislative directives, the agency occasionally must modify its regulations to meet changing circumstances. These curative measures usually…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Good Samaritan Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State of New Jersey v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Carrie J. Cox, for Michael K. Cox, S.S. Nvk-Tp-Ducg v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Haley v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Canisius College v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API