Legal Opinion
Cline Electric Mfg. Co. v. Kohler
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 6, 1928No. 3993PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlschuler, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Appellants’ contention of want of invention over the prior art is based on British patents to Phipps, 1844, No. 10234; to Tomlinson, 1867, No. 628; to Newton, 1871, No. 1825; to Maguire, 1885, No. 11755; to Marks, 1897, No. 18740; and to Annand, 1898, No. 9721; United States patents to Crowell, 1887, No. 365051; and to Moody, 1898, No. 598107. It is apparent, from examination of these patents and the detailed evidence of the patent experts concerning them, that no one of them embodies all of the elements which inventor Stone combined in his device. To fully…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- T. H. Symington Co. v. National Malleable Castings Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Charles Peckat Mfg. Co. v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- James C. Hobbs v. Wisconsin Power & Light Company and William Powell CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. Thomas J. AllenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Jeoffroy Mfg., Inc. v. William T. Graham. William T. Graham v. Jeoffroy Mfg., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Dart Industries, Inc. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.