Legal Opinion

Gerstenzang v. Glenville News Florist, No. Cv96 0152839 S (Mar. 15, 2001)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 15, 2001No. CV96 0152839 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: Motion for Judment Notwithstanding the Verdict or to Set Aside Verdict: Motion to Set Aside Verdict as Excessive: Motion for Remittitur: and Motion for Collateral Source Reduction

This case was tried to conclusion before a jury and on July 27, 2000, there was a plaintiff's verdict in the amount of $208,005.75. The defendant, Maurice Roddy, the former Commissioner of Public Works for the town of Greenwich, filed the following post-verdict motions: (1) for judgment notwithstanding the verdict,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Evon v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Burns v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Sestito v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API