Legal Opinion
Hood v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided July 31, 2013No. Civil Action Nos. 3:12-cv-565-WHB-LRA, 3:12-cv-571, 3:12-cv-572, 3:12-cv-573, 3:12-cv-574, 3:12-cv-575PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM H. BARBOUR, JR., District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the Motions of Plaintiff to Remand. Having considered the pleadings, the attachments thereto, as well as supporting and opposing authorities, the Court finds the Motions are not well taken and should be denied.
I. Factual Background and Procedural History
In June of 2012, the State of Mississippi, by and through its Attorney General, Jim Hood (“Hood”), brought the following lawsuits in the Chancery Court for the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi “to protect citizen consumers of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- New Mexico ex rel. King v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2019