Legal Opinion

Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided April 4, 2019No. CAUSE NO. 3:08-CV-780-CWR-LRAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Carlton W. Reeves, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

*725Federal courts "have an independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from any party." Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. , 546 U.S. 500, 514, 126 S.Ct. 1235, 163 L.Ed.2d 1097 (2006) (citation omitted). This obligation helps the judiciary adhere to the principles of federalism enshrined in the Constitution. It exists no matter what the parties may prefer or how much time they have spent preparing their case for adjudication in federal court.1 If "a federal court determines that it is…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API