Legal Opinion

(PC) Howze v. Orozco

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 20, 2020No. 2:16-cv-01738Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 J.L. HOWZE, No. 2:16-cv-1738 JAM AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 A.B. OROZCO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983 has filed a motion to compel (ECF No. 59), a motion for partial summary judgment (ECF 19 No. 70), a motion to amend the first amended complaint (ECF No. 71), motions disputing the 20 court’s modifications of the scheduling order (ECF Nos. 77, 79), and a motion for leave to file a 21…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Aids Action Committee of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. Nugget Hydroelectric, L.P. v. Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Nutri-Cology, Inc., D/B/A Allergy Research Group Biocurrents, Inc. Stephen A. Levine Susan D. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. RezzonicoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API