Rivers v. Brown
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) This court having held in Rivers v. Hailey, 199 Ga. 38 (supra) that the plaintiff was entitled to recover a part of the salary claimed, the legal effect of the former opinion was to reverse the judgment of the lower court in part only, since the lower court had sustained the demurrer generally. A general demurrer attacks every item of substance in the pleadings of the opposite party, while a special demurrer goes to the structure only. This rule was stated by this court in Martin v. Bartow Iron Works, 35 Ga. 323. as follows: “A general…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Tietjen v. MeldrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Blaylock v. HackelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Thornton v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Thrasher v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Peoples Loan Company v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- South Georgia Medical Center v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Ayers v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Reardon v. BlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Vann v. American Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.