Legal Opinion

State v. Sevy

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1997No. 22195PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

In the magistrate division of the district court, Michael Sevy entered a conditional plea of guilty to driving under the influence of alcohol. Sevy reserved the right to appeal the magistrate’s denial of a motion to suppress incriminating evidence obtained by a police officer following his stop of Sevy’s vehicle. The district court, in its appellate capacity, affirmed the denial of Sevy’s suppression motion. On Sevy’s further appeal to this Court, we conclude that the officer’s stop of Sevy’s vehicle was unjustified and that the derivative evidence therefore must be suppressed.

P…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Cole v. KunzlerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. Van DorneIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. LarsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. SalatoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State v. CerinoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API