Legal Opinion

People v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 23, 1998No. 98SA16PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct between the respondent and the complainant. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The inquiry panel recommended that the respondent be publicly censured and be required to comply with certain conditions and monitoring. We accept the conditional admission and the recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1981. The conditional admission states that a lawyer joined the respondent’s law firm, Wilson & Associates, P.C., as an associate in early 1992.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SatherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re GreenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Norton Frickey, PC v. JAMES B. TURNER, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Marks & Harrison v. NathansonRichmond County Circuit Court · 1999
  4. Norton Frickey, P.C. v. James B. Turner, P.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. DaltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API