Legal Opinion

Marks & Harrison v. Nathanson

Richmond County Circuit Court

Decided April 7, 1999No. Case Nos. LE-2441-4 and HJ-1887-1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Melvin R. Hughes, Jr.

In these cases, one at law seeking a money judgment and the other in equity seeking declaratory relief, the defendant has filed demurrers. Both cases involve common facts concerning the rights and obligations of the parties, an attorney, Nathanson, who was formerly employed with plaintiff, and a law firm, under a written employment contract. The facts that give rise to the parties’ differences will be set out hereafter. On demurrer, the facts alleged are accepted as true. Adkins v. Dixon, 253 Va. 275 (1997); Cox Cable Hampton Roads v. City of Norfolk, 242 Va. 394…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cox Cable Hampton Roads, Inc. v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  2. Adkins v. DixonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  3. La Mantia v. DurstNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Bellamy v. Gates and GillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
  5. Hop-In Food Stores, Inc. v. Serv-N-Save, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Appleton v. AppletonPortsmouth County Circuit Court · 2005
  2. Appleton v. Bondurant & Appleton, P.C.Portsmouth County Circuit Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API