Davenport v. Phillip Morris, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JUNELL, Justice.
Appellants appeal from the granting of appellees’ motion for summary judgment. In one point of error appellants claim the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motion because their original petition was filed within the time period specified by the applicable statute of limitations. We affirm.
On June 9, 1986 appellants, the surviving wife and children of Charles A. Davenport, filed suit against appellees, six cigarette manufacturers, four cigarette distributors, a scientific organization, and a tobacco industry group, alleging that Mr. Davenport died of emphysema and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bounds v. CaudleTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Leal v. C. C. Pitts Sand & Gravel, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
- Schwing v. Bluebonnet Express, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1973
- Thompson v. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1904
- Karling v. Lower Colorado River AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Russell v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Upton County, Tex. v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1997
- Schaefer v. Gulf Coast Regional Blood CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Garza-Vale v. Kwiecien, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
- Wilson v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.