Boyce v. Killip
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, C. J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a decree of the circuit court, entered after trial, which dismissed their complaint. The plaintiffs-appellants are husband and wife; the defendants-respondents are likewise husband and wife. The purposes of the suit were (1) to reform two contracts; (2) to require the defendants to perform specifically the contracts as reformed; and (3) in the event specific performance was impractical to award the plaintiffs damages.
The assignments of error are:
“The court erred in finding that the evidence does not sustain plaintiffs’ allegation of fraud and…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Application of FilippiniNevada Supreme Court · 1949
- Williams Et Ux v. SwartzOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Vandehey v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Sea Fare, Inc. v. Port of AstoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- French v. ChristnerOregon Supreme Court · 1944