Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Killip

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, C. J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a decree of the circuit court, entered after trial, which dismissed their complaint. The plaintiffs-appellants are husband and wife; the defendants-respondents are likewise husband and wife. The purposes of the suit were (1) to reform two contracts; (2) to require the defendants to perform specifically the contracts as reformed; and (3) in the event specific performance was impractical to award the plaintiffs damages.

The assignments of error are:

“The court erred in finding that the evidence does not sustain plaintiffs’ allegation of fraud and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of FilippiniNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Williams Et Ux v. SwartzOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Vandehey v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. Sea Fare, Inc. v. Port of AstoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. French v. ChristnerOregon Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API