Legal Opinion
O'Brien v. County of Rockingham
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 6, 1923PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParsons, C. J.
“Each county is a body corporate for the purpose of suing and being sued.” P. S., c. 24, s. 1. But, as said in Eastman v. Meredith, 36 N. H. 284, 289, of the similar statutory declaration as to towns (R. S., c. 31, s. 1; P. S., c. 40, s. 1), “declaring them to be corporations can not confer upon them other powers or subject them to other duties than those which are conferred and imposed either by express provision of some statute, or are implied from the general character and design of such public corporations.” Markey v. County, 154 N. Y. 675, 679.
“'It is an established principle of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Beers Ex Rel. Platenius v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- State ex rel. Police Commissioners v. County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864
- Markey v. . County of QueensNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
3Cited by16 opinions
- Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Laney v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Granite Oil Securities, Inc. v. Douglas CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1950
- Larsen v. County of YumaArizona Supreme Court · 1924
- Johnson v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.